
We've been independently researching and testing products for over 120 years. If you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more about our review process.
If you're just getting into running or you're a seasoned marathoner, you'll want to choose wisely when it comes to the right gear. Whether it's running shoes, a sports bra or shorts, one component of your outfit can make or break your experience. The last thing you want to run in is a pair of shorts that'll cause chafing or overheating.
That's why at the Good Housekeeping Institute Textiles Lab, our analysts evaluated 29 different styles with dozens of consumer testers and specialized equipment to find the best running shorts for any and all scenarios, assessing factors like material, construction, moisture-wicking and shrinkage. Our testers ran for over 130 hours in total, both on treadmills and on trails. Some testers even wore their assigned pairs during races, and provided extensive feedback on their real-world user experience. Several racked up more than 30 miles to help us find the best of the best.
Pros
Wide-cut leg
Reflective detailing
Moisture-wicking, quick-dry fabric
Cons
Waistband may run small for some
Lululemon's activewear is a favorite amongst GH experts and fitness fanatics for being both well-designed and well-made. Its Hotty Hot running short is specifically designed with wider leg openings and a curved hem for easy movement. It also has reflective details for visibility, and the collection offers both high-rise and low-rise variations in two inseams (2.5 inches and 4 inches).
Tester notes: This pair proved how thoughtful design makes all the difference. One tester said, "They are so comfortable to wear, from the feel to the fabric to the way the style catches the air as I run — they don't slow me down and maybe, just maybe, help me run faster."
Others found the fabric great for sweaty runs, with one who shared, "Sometimes it feels like running shorts just absorb the sweat and the sweat sticks around, but these shorts felt like they dried just as quickly as they wicked away sweat."
I personally tested this pair and was surprised by how it didn't ride up, a frequent problem for my thicker thighs. Some testers also noted that the waistband may run small.
Sizes | 0 to 20 |
Inseam | 2.5" or 4" |
Pros
Thousands of positive reviews
Respectable scores in Lab tests
Wide variety of colors
Cons
Some reviewers said lighter colors are sheer
Too short for taller testers
Under Armour's Fly By 2.0 Running Shorts are a steal, costing a fraction of other picks and boasting over 17,000 five-star reviews on Amazon. Available in a wide range of colors, they're made with 100% polyester material that wicks sweat away and dries quickly, while the mesh detailing on the side allows for breathability.
Tester notes: Our testers unanimously agreed: The shorts felt lightweight and breathable. I also liked the internal drawstring so you can easily adjust the waistband to your preferred fit. Beyond that, the fabric showed minimal shrinkage and solid moisture-wicking capabilities in our tests.
One GH analyst has had a pair of Under Armour running shorts for a decade and says they still perform just as well now as they did when she first wore them, holding up to consistent use and washing. Some downsides are that tall testers found them too short, while some reviewers found the lighter colors to be sheer.
Sizes | XS to 3X |
Inseam | 3.5" |
Pros
Top scores in Lab tests
High praise for appearance from testers
Simple, understated appearance
Cons
One small pocket
While some activewear may look overly technical and may seem out of place beyond the gym, these running shorts were deemed stylish and versatile by several testers. Although they might look simple, don't let that fool you: They proved to be high performing on the road, wicking away sweat with ease. And while this pair has a 2.5-inch inseam, Vuori also offers a 4-inch inseam, albeit with less colors to choose from.
Tester notes: These shorts earned some of the highest scores from consumer testers, who were surprised by just how much they liked wearing them for both exercise and everyday wear. As one tester put it: "Often running shorts feel disproportionately sparse when paired with a short sports bra, but these make me feel comfortable and attractive when paired with any top — which is sometimes the best motivation to get me out the door and on that treadmill." Still, our testers and I disliked that there was only one tiny pocket that didn't seem very useable.
Sizes | XXS to XXL |
Inseam | 2.5" or 4" |
Pros
Multiple pockets within waistband
Airy, lightweight fabric
High scores in durability tests
Cons
Lower appearance scores from testers
Out on the trails, you'll need durable gear that'll last, especially during any unexpected snags. REI's in-house brand of running shorts proved both durable and high performing in tests, with innovative fabric and functional pockets throughout the waistband (similar to those you'd find in a running belt).
Tester notes: This pair's fabric is truly functional: There's perforations throughout in a grid pattern to allow for added breathability, which is a must when running outdoors in the summer heat. Our testers immediately took note of this on their runs. "The mesh fabric was very airy and comfortable," said one. "The fabric didn't stick to my skin."
Others praised the pockets, with one happy runner who reported, "These shorts allowed me to fit both my phone and keys in [one] pocket without any movement or jiggling whatsoever." They did, however, receive lower scores on appearance from testers.
Sizes | XS to 3X |
Inseam | 3" or 5" |
Pros
Generous front and back pockets
Waistband stayed in place, according to testers
Long inseam helps minimize chafing
Cons
Waistband felt too tight for some testers
Whether you're taller or simply want more coverage, finding running shorts that aren't too short can be a challenge. Luckily, this pick from Baleaf has a 7-inch inseam and comes with quick Amazon Prime shipping. The legs have a looser fit for extra comfort with two large front pockets. There's also a zippered back pocket in the waistband that easily fit a phone during testing.
Tester notes: Several testers who typically opt for long shorts called them "perfect." Others liked the generous pockets, which helped keep their phones, earphones and keys in place without any issues. Another said, "No chafing while running and the waistband staying in place was the best!"
Still, there was some inconsistency with sizing. While some testers found they fit true-to-size, others found the waistband too tight, despite efforts to adjust it. Be sure to check the size guide for your most accurate size.
Sizes | XS to XXL |
Inseam | 7" |
Pros
Helps minimize chafing
Buttery soft inner fabric
Not too compressive
Cons
Liner is longer than outer shorts
What's great about two-in-one shorts is that they feature a lightweight shell with built-in compression shorts to help reduce chafing. The inner layer is comparable to bike shorts, offering support, while the outer shell covers up the skin-tight fit, making it a more approachable pick. Plus, Athleta consistently impresses our experts in testing, standing out for its moisture-wicking technical fabrics.
Tester notes: Our testers especially liked the wide waistband of this pair and how secure it felt on their bodies. One said, "the inner shorts hold onto your leg well without feeling like it's squeezing them...The fabric is thick enough that I feel supported and it's soft to the touch."
Several reported no chafing or riding up during running. Some, however, cautioned that getting the proper size is crucial as the shorts felt "less stretchy" than similar styles, especially if you tend to size up for a looser fit. The liner is also longer than the outer shorts, which some may not like.
Sizes | XXS to XL |
Inseam | 4" (biker shorts) and 1.5" (outer shorts) |
Pros
Aced moisture-management testing
Comfortable, wide waistband
Hidden drawcord waistband
Cons
Limited color selection
Bike-style shorts aren’t just great for biking. They're perfect for all types of exercise, including running, because the fitted design allows for easy movement. lululemon's Wunder Train line has excelled in our tests (the workout leggings beat out dozens of contenders) and its bike shorts are no exception.
Though there is a limited color selection, this pair comes in four inseams with sizes available from 0 to 20. The comfortable, wide waistband is designed with a hidden drawcord to adjust the fit.
Tester notes: Compared to other bike shorts we've tested, these stood out for feeling lightweight yet not cheap or flimsy. The stretchy fabric easily wicked away moisture in tests and earned top scores from our testers.
They're also a favorite of Senior Textiles Product Analyst Emma Seymour who said, "I have the 6-inch inseam and find that it's the perfect length on me: Short enough to be cute and stylish but long enough to stay in place when exercising."
Sizes | 0 to 20 |
Inseam | 2", 4", 6" and 8" |
Pros
Very lightweight
Well-engineered design
Moisture-wicking, quick-dry fabric
Cons
Runs small, according to testers
Light as a feather, nothing can hold you back when you're wearing these shorts. Nike's Aeroswift shorts are a go-to for many runners come race day due to how weightless they feel. They're completely split on the sides, which means that despite the 3-inch inseam, these shorts may feel extremely short. Still, there's a built-in liner for much-needed security.
Tester notes: If you've never tried this style before, the first run can feel eye-opening. One tester shared, "It felt like I wasn't even wearing any shorts. [I was] running without any constriction[s]."
Although it's important to note that you'll still feel protected: Another tester commented, "The material is very thin and lightweight, but the brief liner and waistband made [the shorts] feel very secure." The material wicked away moisture like a dream. However, several testers felt it ran small.
Sizes | XXS to XXL |
Inseam | 3" |
Pros
Distinctive, semi-fitted silhouette
Perfect scores in moisture-management tests
Multiple pockets within waistband
Cons
Low appearance scores from some testers
For sweaty runners, moisture-wicking apparel is essential, especially in hot summer weather. Amongst the many running shorts we tested, this pair beat out all others when it came to wicking away moisture.
The fabric had minimal stretch in our evaluations but it is fitted to the body for a "non-poofy" look, as the brand proclaims. There are also multiple pockets within the waistband.
Tester notes: Our testers reaffirmed our in-Lab results. One said, "The material doesn't get gross and sweaty." Another also described the fabric as "solid" and "substantial," but, beyond that, it doesn't make the loud crinkly noise you'd expect of typical running shorts. Compared to other popular styles on the market, the Roga shorts are undeniably unique, with a fit in between the loose running shorts and tight, compressive bike shorts.
Note, some of our testers personally weren't a fan of the semi-fitted silhouette, but many online reviewers love how the shorts meld to their form and move with their body.
Sizes | 2 to 24/26 |
Inseam | 1.75", 4", 6", 8" |
Pros
Built-in pockets on inner shorts
Chic crossover waistband detail
Fun, flared silhouette
Cons
Inner layer rode up slightly for some testers
Sometimes, all you really want is a pair of running shorts cute enough to wear on runs and straight to brunch. Still, you won't want to feel incredibly sweaty or uncomfortable in between, so some functionality is needed. While that's easier said than done, these shorts from Aerie have won over several GH testers who called them "extremely comfortable" and "flattering."
Tester notes: Aerie's leggings and bike shorts have a buttery soft feel, and this pair uses the same fabric for the inner base shorts. Our testers gave the material high scores for its comfort and appreciated the large built-in pockets, similar to what you'd expect from an exercise dress. Though the inner layer rode up slightly for some testers.
Many also complimented the appearance, noting that the crossover waistband and the flared silhouette had a very feminine look.
Sizes | XS to XXL |
Inseam | 2" |
More running shorts to consider

We've rounded up the best of the running shorts we've tested, but here are our thoughts on other contenders from our evaluations.
lululemon Speed Up High-Rise Lined Short: A favorite of our Nutrition & Wellness Lab director Stefani Sassos, this pair's design is similar to our pick from Oiselle. Although it is only offered in 2.5- and 4-inch inseams.
Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts: While the material and construction were top notch, the women's style didn't perform as well in consumer tests. Some testers reported chafing due to the short length. Still, the quality was impeccable.
On Running Shorts: Another two-in-one style, this pair earned praise from consumer testers for its comfort, but it didn't perform as well in our moisture-management tests. As a result, it's best for testers who tend not to sweat much.
Janji AFO Shorts: A popular lightweight pair with excellent construction, this pair shrank a bit after several launderings. While some testers had nothing but praise, others felt the fit was either too tight or too loose on their bodies, making the testing experience uncomfortable.
Athleta Mesh Racer Mid-Rise Shorts: We previously featured this pair, as the fabric performed well in moisture-management and dimensional-stability testing. This round, our consumer testers were divided on the design. Some felt it ran large, which resulted in a falling waistband despite any attempts to adjust it.
How we test running shorts for women

At the Good Housekeeping Institute Textiles Lab, we test fitness gear of all sorts from sports bras for running to running shoes for womenusing specialized equipment in Lab and with the help of consumer testers.
This year, we tested 29 different pairs of running shorts with the help of over 70 runners of all experience levels and sizes, who took them on treadmills, roads and trails throughout the country. Our testers ran for a total of over 130 hours with some racking up over 30 miles in a single session.
Here are some factors we consider when narrowing down the best women's running shorts:

✔️ Moisture management: To understand how well fabrics will perform against sweat, we measure how quickly and effectively droplets of water or synthetic sweat solution are wicked away from the fabric's surface using our Moisture Management Tester.
✔️ Pilling: For bike shorts and compression shorts, swatches of fabric are rubbed together using our Martindale Pilling & Abrasion Tester to see if they will form small balls of fiber on the surface (also known as pills) after each series of 100 cycles for a total of 1,000 runs.
✔️ Construction: Our textiles experts analyze how well the apparel has been pieced together, looking for design features like quality fabrics, flat seams and secure linings. We also make note of any pockets and try fitting our personal phones, cards, wallets, earphones and keys to gauge whether they're practical.
✔️ Washability: We run garments through repeated laundry cycles to analyze shrinkage, appearance and colorfastness and to generally observe how well the garments withstand consistent washing.
✔️ Consumer testing: Our consumer testers rate the overall fit and comfort of each pair, noting whether the waistband stayed in place, if their shorts rode up while running or if they experienced any chafing. They also shared feedback on what they liked or disliked and compared the shorts to any others they've owned.
What to look for when shopping for the best running shorts

When buying running shorts, here are features you should look out for:
✔️ Fabric: Performance fabrics made of fibers like polyester and nylon will wick sweat away, keeping you dry while exercising. Elastane, spandex or Lycra fiber blends have stretch and improve compression. Avoid cotton fabrics, as they can hold onto sweat and moisture, which can feel uncomfortable and weigh you down.
✔️ Liner: Many running shorts feature a lining of some kind, whether it has built-in underwear or a liner that extends to cover your thighs. If there’s no liner, make sure to wear proper running underwear to prevent wedgies, dampness and chafing.
✔️ Inseam: A standard pair of running shorts has an inseam between 3 and 9 inches, with an average of around 5 inches.
- A shorter inseam (2 to 4 inches) makes for a shorter short. The shorter length allows for a little more mobility and may be more comfortable for higher-speed runs, but it won't provide as much coverage.
- A longer inseam (7 to 9 inches) is great for protecting against friction while you're running, especially for longer distances.
- Make sure to also take into account your own inseam (the distance from your crotch to your ankle bone) and height. Shorts with a longer inseam may look awkward on petite frames, while shorts with a shorter inseam may feel uncomfortable for tall runners.
✔️ Pockets: If you’re running outside on a road, track or trail, you’ll want an easy way to bring your valuables with you (think: ID, keys and phone). Many running shorts have hidden pockets on the hip or waistband for small items, while others have zippered pockets to ensure larger belongings stay secure. If you choose shorts without storage, try a running phone holder, a running belt or a fanny pack.
Why trust Good Housekeeping?

Grace Wu most recently updated this story. She's a textiles product review analyst at Good Housekeeping and oversaw recent in-Lab and consumer tests for running shorts. An avid runner, she's tested and written about all sorts of running essentials, like the best workout tops and best running socks, and tried several pairs of running shorts for this story. Prior to joining GH, Grace earned a Master of Engineering in materials science and engineering and a Bachelor of Science in fiber science from Cornell University.
Emma Seymour originally wrote this story and provided tips on what to consider when shopping for running shorts. She's a senior textiles analyst at Good Housekeeping and has overseen recent Lab and consumer tests of fitness gear like workout shoes, sports bras and leggings. She has a degree from Cornell University in Fiber Science and Apparel Design and a strong fashion background with expertise in proper fit and construction.
Amanda Constantine previously updated this story. She's a home & apparel reviews analyst at Good Housekeeping with a background in consumer sciences, apparel merchandising and marketing communications. Prior to joining GH, she served as a lecturer at Ohio State University, teaching fashion and textiles courses and conducting research.
Grace Wu (she/her) is a product reviews analyst at the Good Housekeeping Institute's Textiles, Paper and Apparel Lab, where she evaluates fabric-based products using specialized equipment and consumer tester data. Prior to starting at Good Housekeeping in 2022, she earned a master of engineering in materials science and engineering and a bachelor of science in fiber science from Cornell University. While earning her degrees, Grace worked in research laboratories for smart textiles and nanotechnology and held internships at Open Style Lab and Rent the Runway.


The 15 Best Tinted Sunscreens

The 7 Best Enzyme Cleaners for Pet Stains

The Best Eye Creams

The Best Ice Cream Makers